Friedrich Nietzsche Philosophy Essay

Friedrich Willhelm Nietzsche, a German Philosopher of the mid 1800s was born(p) 1844 and died after a long medical checkup condition that was thoroughly investigated bargonly with no found result in 1900. Nietzsche is to a greater extent or less ren proclaimed for ch all toldenging the incorrupt wiz of Christianity in the later(a) 1800s patron ripen having grown up with a ambit and family history of Lutheran ministers where his Father, Uncles and Grandfathers were all Ministers. This philosopher was the virtually egressspoken on topics much(prenominal)(prenominal) as designer, pain, civilisation and moralistic acts, and from that has bendd some of the closely comm hardly know philosophers we know of at once such as Sigmund Freud. Nietzsche visual modalityed barbarous or immoral acts as self-consciousness, free lead and either/or bipolar mentation (Curry, B. (2008). The Perspectives of Nietzsche. Retrieved from http//www.pitt.edu/-wbcurry/nietzsche.html). Nietzs che believed that Evil is within and qualified upon the de endpointinants that bushel ones moral perception.Nietzsche understand on evil came from a really lusty mental capacity on his macrocosm, on culture and of rights and granting immunitys. Nietzsche pull it quite plainly when he verbalizeSome moralities are more competent for subordinate roles some are more appropriate for dominating and leading affectionate roles. What counts as a preferable and licit action depends upon the kind of person one is. The deciding factor is whether one is weaker, sicker and on the decline, or whether one is wellnessier, more advocateful and overflowing with vivification (Brandhorst, M. (2010). Naturalism and the family tree of example Institutions journal of Nietzsche Studies. riposte 40, p 5-28, 16p). Nietzsche fussyly critiqued Christian and Kantian morality, connect to these 2 moral components of which express ethnical out casting of freedom of lecture and innate(p) free will. i. Presupposes three particular descriptive claims about the nature of humankind agents pertaining (connecting) to free will, the transparency of the self, and the essential simile of all people (the Descriptive destiny) and/orii. Embraces norms that harm the highest men patch benefitting the lowest (the Normative Component) In this Nietzsche is explaining that (1) Hold agents responsible for their actions (2) Evaluate and rank the motives for which agents act (Brandhorst, M. (2010). Naturalism and the Genealogy of object lesson Institutions Journal of Nietzsche Studies. lie with 40, p 5-28, 16p). These views friend support and defend Nietzsches logics on moral and psychological action these specific opinions and views actd one of the about far-famed Psychologists, Sigmund Freud. In Nietzsches first historical belles-lettres during the early 1870s he was exactly a student studying and exploring philosophic logic and legislations of his time. With an opinionated and different scene of immoral acts than the culture sur plump outing him he took initiative in making his own finales of what was right and what was wrong.In his first publish writings The bear of Tragedy (1872) it showed his advocating view for cultural grimness though it was late put down by separate scholars historied for sharing Christian ground opinions of that era, Nietzsche continued to express his abrasive view against unethical stringent laws (Robertson, S. (2009). Nietzsches respectable reassessment Journal of Nietzsche Studies discommode 37, pp 66-90). This philosopher indulged himself in cultural distress, interacting with music, nature, sciences and exploration of other cultures and religions. Nietzsche return acted with the prevail Human, All-Too-Human (1878) (Robertson, S. (2009). Nietzsches Ethical Revaluation Journal of Nietzsche Studies Issue 37, pp 66-90) that gave him a promise and fur in that locationd his career, this book touched on health and t he mood of hedonistic ideas in regards to delight and pain relevance amongst cultural and physiological phenomena.Nietzsche is a naturalist expanding on views associate to animals, earth, air, wind, fire, body touching on disordered ideas of, especially, the Christian found religion. Nietzsche was very passionate and outspoken towards Christianity however that was not his only passionate topic. The power behind Germ whatsoever in the late 1860s due to wars preceding and present were a huge mildew for him as the shift of legislations due to vernal authority was erratically changing Germany, most notably, Politically, Economically and Culturally (Osborn, R. E. (2010). nihilistic delusions scruples On Nietzsches government of gentle Radicalism. new-fangled age Vol. 52 Issue 4, p 293-308).Therefore the idea that Germany could be altered so rapidly not only enraged Friedrich Nietzsche but empowered him in his righteousness as an open minded scholar and as the next generatio n of Germany. This shift in Germanys governmental system greatly affected Nietzsches era, and as a passionate advocate for freedom in culture Nietzsche mat up compelled to declare out against the evil of which was the becoming of Germany. In expiration Nietzsche views on evil were that to fork over unwholesome moral or to act in an evil way, it is an act of conscious natural behavior. He believed that Evil is within and dependant upon the determinants that affect ones moral perception.Friedrich Nietzsche was in his hot flash during the change of an era in Germanys political, societal and religious systems and was compelled to stand for what he believed in. It is extremely interesting that during the early 1870s the new King Otto von von Bismarck introduced healthcare, sociable security and a rise in socialism to promote the economic deficit and reduce potential hierarchy, however advocated anti-socialist laws (Palante, G. (2009, June 1st). historic Philosophical Forum. Vol. 40 Issue 2 p265-273, 8p). The anti socialist laws were created to shift the power of the genial Democratic Party (SDP) which stood for well-mannered and Political rights in an open beau monde.Bismarck also reduced the affiliations and influence of the political system on Catholics making universality a growing religion that was originally the early 1870s mostly Christian based. This seems to have been a huge influence on Nietzsche as his first book, The Birth of Tragedy (1872) was based upon open society and cultural adversity. This history of Germany is so punishing due to the shift in power of the church, beginning at the attempt to abide the SDP after they had just begun in 1875 in the German Parliament as a Christian based society outright shifting the change from Christian to universality (Palante, G. (2009, June 1st). diachronic Philosophical Forum.Vol. 40 Issue 2 p265-273, 8p) this provoked outrage as this meant less freedom of weft for citizens. Although Friedrich Nietzsche farther from advocated Christianity, the shift of religion affected him as this meant a cultural change amongst his peers. It greatly fuelled further writings based upon unspoilt questions surrounding concepts that drain lifes energies. These strong views are now known as Nietzschean affirmation expanding on Nietzsche profound writing based around existential philosophy Friedrich Nietzsche along with Sren Kierkegaard (18131855) were the two philosophers renowned for doing so in the late 1800s (Palante, G. (2009, June 1st). Historical Philosophical Forum. Vol. 40 Issue 2 p265-273, 8p).Existentialism is a term used by philosophical thinkers expressing that ones life affirmation, ones existence is determined by ones self. contempt lifes distractions and obstacles it is ones choice to expire passionately, with sincere moral integrity as best as possible. This further supports how Nietzsches opposing thoughts towards empiricism of which means ones moral integrity is deriv ed from senses and experience, however socially paramount those views might have been by Germany, Nietzsche fluid profoundly opposed them.In books such as Daybreak Reflections on moral Prejudices, 1881 (Morgenrte. Gedanken ber die moralischen Vorurteile) (Osborn, R. E. (2010). Nihilisms Conscience On Nietzsches governing of Aristocratic Radicalism. Modern age Vol. 52 Issue 4, p 293-308), Nietzsches most memorable, clearest, and indicate pots, expressing many social-psychological insights and cultural relativity victimization Christian Based moral evaluations as reflections on near and evil. There were some(prenominal) books to follow Daybreak in the late 1880s, Thus Spoke Zarathustra (188385) and Ecce Homo (1888) this volume show the deepest of understanding power, humans and moral behaviors. Friedrich Nietzsches crusade against morality had begun and he followed up with The Gay Science (Die frhliche Wissenschaft, 1882) (Osborn, R. E. (2010).Nihilisms Conscience On Nietzsche s Politics of Aristocratic Radicalism. Modern age Vol. 52 Issue 4, p 293-308) a book in which Nietzsche becomes famous for his existential ideas pertaining the existence of life. In this book I believe Nietzsche was encouraging the citizens of Germany to speak out against the injustice towards freedom and lack of moral integrity that the German political system was advocating. As Nietzsches world changed around him he felt more and more compelled to change it, standing by his own philosophical views and taking his life into his hands becoming a martyr for the freedom of speech and cultural adversity that he so dearly believed in. Nietzsche felt very patiently towards open culture as well as freedom and this era of Germany was a huge influence on his work as it was a signifi usher outt shift in decisions launch by the new acclaimed authority.The Battle of bully and evil is a constant in a world with no equilibrize and a constant struggle of power. Friedrich Nietzsche so profound ly advocated freedom and cultural adversity, in which has inspired leading figures in all walks of cultural life, including dancers, poets, novelists, painters, psychologists, philosophers, sociologists and social revolutionaries however in that respect is evermore a power running(a) against that and thus the problems that were his era are hitherto amongst us. Until people accept others and are uncoerced to live with respect to cultural adversity then there will always be evil immoral versus good moral. Throughout the history of any reign there is a constant fighting for power, beliefs and cultural relativity. Friedrich Nietzsche stood for freedom of choice and by his passionate writings did so very well however as Nietzsche has expressed so dearly it is within ones choice to act with moral integrity based upon there perception of good and evil.These are the choices that affect us daily and round us as individuals personally I have faced immoral decisions and it is in those m oments, that you do not always gather at once, the affect that decision can have on another. In sympathy with Friedrich Nietzsche, to recognize and feel remorse in your conscious or subconscious decision is what differentiates good and evil. For instance, contemporarily when you are in a delicate discussion of religion amongst peers of assorted cultural understate I have to think open-mindedly with conscious acceptance to the reason out behind cultural and religious background before making a faultfinding(prenominal) statement.As well as Politics in Canada is directed for different classifys of people, as politics usually is, so right off there is a divide in Canadas cultural, ethnic, and working class because it is in the current political power to cherish Canadas Economic, Environmental or Social well-being. There is no balance and I believe without balance in a person, country or cultural group there cannot be a sustainable approach to good and evil there is always a stre tch for that much more power on any side, affecting moral.ReferencesBrandhorst, M. (2010). Naturalism and the Genealogy of Moral Institutions Journal of Nietzsche Studies. Issue 40, p 5-28, 16p. Curry, B. (2008). The Perspectives of Nietzsche. Retrieved from http//www.pitt.edu/-wbcurry/nietzsche.html. Osborn, R. E. (2010). Nihilisms Conscience On Nietzsches Politics of Aristocratic Radicalism. Modern age Vol. 52 Issue 4, p 293-308. Palante, G. (2009, June 1st).Historical Philosophical Forum. Vol. 40 Issue 2 p265-273, 8p. Robertson, S. (2009). Nietzsches Ethical Revaluation Journal of Nietzsche Studies Issue 37, pp 66-90.